• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Fiesta ST Forum and Fiesta ST community dedicated to Fiesta ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Fiesta ST Forum today!


Thermostat question.

grnmachine02

Active member
Messages
514
Likes
108
Location
Fredericksburg
#21
Ran the TOTD two times last summer, NC to TN both times with my 2016 W/Mountune 215 and stock cooling, A/C on, temp gauge went to 4 bars toward the end once but still in the normal range. Spent many hours in bumper to bumper traffic in Atlanta last summer with anger issues but not cooling issues.

Wonder what changes were made to the '16? Are you running a front plate? I'm not but it seems to me the way it was placed would affect air flow. Also did 3 trips to New Orleans in July/August with no issues. Hope it stays that way.
Thankfully my car has never actually overheated. Seems bumper to bumper traffic in the summer is what it doesn't like. I see higher temps there than I do running the dragon. Weird.

Anyhow, I am running a front plate (thanks Virginia!) I think I'm gonna get the DHM crashbar and shave the grill. Might even do the mishimoto radiator then as well, seeing as I'm already halfway there doing the crash bar.
 


grnmachine02

Active member
Messages
514
Likes
108
Location
Fredericksburg
#23
^^^That's where a manual over-ride fan switch (like I had on my last car) comes in handy. ;)
Yes, but the fan is already on kill mode when sitting in traffic. I think there are two issues at play here. 1) a woefully small radiator. 2) A thermostat that is a higher temp than it should be, so the car can meet emissions standards.

Now obviously I'm just spitballing with that last one, as I can't actually prove that. That's my arm chair engineer opinion.
 


OP
AntTrain
Messages
211
Likes
43
Location
Las Vegas
Thread Starter #24
Fuck it, I just ended up doing the radiator AND oil cooler yesterday. Only took us about 11 hours. With breaks of course :)

 


Intuit

3000 Post Club
Messages
3,602
Likes
2,205
Location
South West Ohio
#25
Manual says the thermostat begins to open around a specific temp and completely opens by another temp.
 


Sekred

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,395
Likes
401
Location
Mid North Coast
#27
The difference between when the thermostat first begins to open and fully open is usually around 20F.
 


OP
AntTrain
Messages
211
Likes
43
Location
Las Vegas
Thread Starter #28
Now that I have both the oil cooler and radiator I notice that my charge temps are about 10 degrees hotter. I guess they dissipate that much heat and it's getting absorbed by the intercooler.
 


Messages
16
Likes
2
Location
Las Vegas
#29
Same boat and interested in how well that combo cools things down. Ambient temps over 100F plus any grade just causes the temps to climb for me.
 


Messages
206
Likes
39
Location
Indianapolis
#30
The difference between when the thermostat first begins to open and fully open is usually around 20F.
Can you feel the difference in performance? In the 80's, specific to my GN, the idea behind using a 160 t-stat was to lower charge temps. This increased power output provided you had a chip that could take advantage of the upgrade.

Note:
This does have an impact on emissions as previously stated.
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Messages
13,999
Likes
6,697
Location
Princeton, N.J.
#31
In the 80's, specific to my GN, the idea behind using a 160 t-stat was to lower charge temps. This increased power output provided you had a chip that could take advantage of the upgrade.
Was/Isn't the factory intercooler (IF you had one of the latter ones that even had an IC) on those mounted to the side of the radiator, and not blocking it at all? (I forget now, it's been so long since I've seen a factory stock version.)
 


Last edited:

Sekred

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,395
Likes
401
Location
Mid North Coast
#32
Can you feel the difference in performance? In the 80's, specific to my GN, the idea behind using a 160 t-stat was to lower charge temps. This increased power output provided you had a chip that could take advantage of the upgrade.

Note:
This does have an impact on emissions as previously stated.
I really have no idea if using a thermostat with a lower opening temp will affect power (aka the Mishimoto) but there are a number of manufactures using electronic thermostats that have an operating range of approximately 80-110c. The idea is to run hot (around 110C) during low load cruising conditions where the highest benefit to fuel economy can be achieved and also reduce emissions, then run cooler (around 80C) under high load to reduce the likelihood of detonation. This is what I have been told anyway.
 


Messages
206
Likes
39
Location
Indianapolis
#33
Was/Isn't the factory intercooler (IF you had one of the latter ones that even had an IC) on those mounted to the side of the radiator, and not blocking it at all? (I forget now, it's so long since I've seen a factory stock version.)
86 and 87 had ic and they were mounted behind the radiator. 160 t-stat, high speed fan relay kit and custom chip were some of the first upgrades most made. 150 to 180 is the ideal engine temp for power with the ic as cold as you can get it.
 


Messages
206
Likes
39
Location
Indianapolis
#34
I really have no idea if using a thermostat with a lower opening temp will affect power (aka the Mishimoto) but there are a number of manufactures using electronic thermostats that have an operating range of approximately 80-110c. The idea is to run hot (around 110C) during low load cruising conditions where the highest benefit to fuel economy can be achieved and also reduce emissions, then run cooler (around 80C) under high load to reduce the likelihood of detonation. This is what I have been told anyway.
If heat is bleeding over to the ic then you are probably hurting performance. You want the ic as cold as you can get it. It may not be something you can feel that is why I was asking. Also if you updated your ic it may be compensating for those losses.
 




Top