• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Fiesta ST Forum and Fiesta ST community dedicated to Fiesta ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Fiesta ST Forum today!


Do you believe that ethanol makes your car way more reliable and can save engines?

Messages
319
Likes
148
Location
Connecticut
#1
It’s a long post I know, bear with me.

i am a big believer in ethanol making your car far safer. We all know it adds power. But what people don’t talk about is how much happier engines are when using e85. Anyone who has driven with e85 will know this, I mean you can immediately tell, the engine just feels, and sounds so much better and healthier. A great example are Subarus, yes, the engine design isn’t perfect, but Porsche uses flat engines, and their engines don’t explode left and right. It’s common knowledge the engines fail from knock, and such. So I believe that a big reason for all the ringland and engine failures on Subarus are from the owners tuning the car, and then not using good enough fuel. And I think if every Subaru owner ran e85 instead of 91/93. The amount of failures would go way down.

The biggest killers in modified engines are knock, and heat. E85’s resistance to knock is obvious, that’s why we use it. But it’s not just about the octane when talking about e85. there have been studies done on temperature reduction. And they say e85 can reduce cylinder temperatures by 40-60%. By removing heat from the cylinders it greatly reduces cylinder pressures and heat, further reducing knock. So, when using e85, you never (or almost never) have any knock or preignition, your cylinder temps are reduced by 40%, greatly reducing pressure, this saves rods, pistons, ringlands, etc.

Now, most people who use e85 do so to up the power. So, they use more boost and timing which does raise cylinder pressures and temps. But I think the amount of heat and pressure removed by e85 fair outweighs the extra heat and pressure added by adding more power. Unless we are talking about adding 200 extra horsepower with e85. But if we are talking about adding 20-30 horsepower. There’s no way that adds enough heat and pressure to outweight the reduction.

so, here’s my question. Does the knock cylinder pressure, and heat reduction from e85 out weight the amount of heat and pressure added from the extra power? Personally I think it does unless you are adding a ton of extra power with e85, meaning ethanol makes your car way safer.

do ylu
 


Intuit

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,058
Likes
2,588
Location
South West Ohio
#2
Suspect one of the reasons manufacturers drop compression ratio before adding turbo (supercharger, N²0) is to provide more of a safety margin for not damaging/blowing up an engine.

Suspect the use of lower energy dense fuels is taking a similar approach. Alcohol and E85 are much less energy dense than 93 pump gas. Seems like this would allow one to more finely tune (control) the explosions.

1705811504984.png
 


gtx3076

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,215
Likes
1,398
Location
US
#3
I ran E30 on my Mazdaspeed 3, and I tuned for E30 as soon as I got my Fiesta. My car has run on E30-E40 for 95% of the 64,000 miles I’ve driven it. It now has 164,000 miles. It’s a good fuel for making power, but I don’t see why anyone running 87-93 would have issues hitting 200k miles with maintenance and a solid tune, stock or not.
 


OP
Stkid93
Messages
319
Likes
148
Location
Connecticut
Thread Starter #4
@gtx3076

Interesting, so you don’t believe e85 makes any difference in how the car runs? And can make the engine last significantly longer by protecting the motor from detonation and failure in some cases? (I’m not necessarily talking about completely stock cars, more talking about tuned cars on 91/93 vs e30.

in my opinion all it could potentially take is a hot spot on the piston or one bad knock event and you lose a piston/rod. Plus the extra heat and pressure by using lower octane gas will help contribute to cracked cylinder walls, ringlands, etc. e85’s entire job is to prevent knock and lower temps and pressure. They say that with e85 and direct injection the “effective octane rating” is about 160 octane. Due to its increase octane, cooling capabilities, reduction in cylinder pressure, etc.

93 isn’t terrible by any means. But not everyone has that in their area some places only go up to 91, and a lot of fist tuners have flash tunes and they only have stage 1 and stage 2, they don’t have different tunes for 91 and 93. Yes, the fist computer is very smart and will adjust the OAR and such to compensate but doing that can only do so much. That’s why you need a tune when running e30, the computer can’t adjust enough on its own. All it takes is a little built up carbon in the cylinder and you can get a hot spot. Causing preignition.

The computer simply reducing some timing isn’t always enough. And by the way anyone who runs 87 octane in their fist is absolutely playing with fire. Turbo cars deserve good fuel and good oil.

think about it like this, the fist is limited to basically 280-300 wheel horsepower on 93 octane. No matter how big of a turbo you have and how much you try to throw at it, you won’t see much past that.

this is because it’s so knock limited that trying to make any more power would damage the motor. Meaning that every fist with over 300 wheel requires ethanol to save the motor. And if they try to make the power without e85, the engine will die.

granted, in this scenario we are talking about a car that’s is pretty modified. but if e85 can save the motor for them. It can do it for everyone.
 


Messages
323
Likes
285
Location
Maryland
#5
In the old days when we tuned by reading plugs, E was a god send compared to just tuning on 93. We were just learning how much more you can get out of a 4Banger with just a little E. Only other alternative was C16 which was getting pricey and was hard on Cats. I have melted heads on E trying to find the limits, but most of that was discovering the diff between the winter blend and summer blends gas stations carried in my area. It def adds a safety margin even adding a bit to your 93 tune if you don't have enough injector to run full E by my findings I'm coming up on 100k miles and have been running E since I got the car with 50K on it. I have notice in a pinch when I had to run 93, as long as I had a bit of my mix in there, I never see any knock retard when monitoring realtime and driving aggressively. I don't make a habit of it tho.
 


OP
Stkid93
Messages
319
Likes
148
Location
Connecticut
Thread Starter #6
@Mega ST

yea the more power you add with e85, the less safety it provides. Since the extra heat and pressure when adding a bunch of power starts to outweigh the reduction in heat and pressure you gained from using e85.

If we are talking about adding 100-200 horsepower when using e85, that’s slightly different.

but with the fist we add maybe 20-30 horsepower, the amount of added heat and pressure from 20 extra horsepower is microscopic when compared to adding 200+ horsepower.
 


Messages
323
Likes
285
Location
Maryland
#7
On my Audi S5 which is a 3.0 V6. Adding two hard parts (Upper and Lower Supercharger pulleys) and E50, it makes +214whp and 210 ft/lbs. So it absolutely can make that much depending on platform. I believe that it is almost 150whp more than can be made with 93. Until we have a proper built engine and fueling for the FiST not sure we’ll see what it can do on straight E85 and large turbo. I’ve seen people with over 415whp but on race gas and I believe that was because the upgraded fuel components available for the platform were maxed on E. You can also get E100 in Drums which has even more knock resistance, but of course requires a much larger fuel system.
 


gtx3076

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,215
Likes
1,398
Location
US
#8
@gtx3076

Interesting, so you don’t believe e85 makes any difference in how the car runs? And can make the engine last significantly longer by protecting the motor from detonation and failure in some cases? (I’m not necessarily talking about completely stock cars, more talking about tuned cars on 91/93 vs e30.
No. I could vent my motor on E85 with a bad tune, wrong fuel, or poor maintenance. I wouldn't think twice about running my 93 tune if ethanol wasn't available.
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Messages
14,648
Likes
7,148
Location
Princeton, N.J.
#9
On my Audi S5 which is a 3.0 V6. Adding two hard parts (Upper and Lower Supercharger pulleys) and E50, it makes +214whp and 210 ft/lbs. So it absolutely can make that much depending on platform. I believe that it is almost 150whp more than can be made with 93. Until we have a proper built engine and fueling for the FiST not sure we’ll see what it can do on straight E85 and large turbo. I’ve seen people with over 415whp but on race gas and I believe that was because the upgraded fuel components available for the platform were maxed on E. You can also get E100 in Drums which has even more knock resistance, but of course requires a much larger fuel system.
The single station within a 40 mile radius which used to sell E85 where I used to live, also sold E98 as 'race fuel' from the same pump island.

Across the street from that Omega Fuels station was a Sunoco which sold their 260 unleaded, @100 octane RON right from the pump (but it was over $10.00/gallon, and that was 7 years ago! [crazyeye]).

The best I can do around here now is the Sunoco 94, and even that is at very few local stations. [:(]
 


slopoke

Active member
Messages
649
Likes
640
Location
Livermore
#10
The only bad thing about Ethanol is availability. In my local area there are quite a few stations that carry it. Going on a long road trip, that's where the logistical headaches start. If I go to Southern Ca, it's not so bad. I just have to detour off of I-5 a few miles to get fuel. Go East into Nevada and through Utah, the headaches begin. Other than that, the cooling properties and the high octane of Ethanol are great. Screenshot 2024-01-21 at 15-59-02 Alternative Fuels Data Center Ethanol Fueling Station Locati...png
 


D1JL

7000 Post Club
Staff Member
Premium Account
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
7,928
Likes
4,188
Location
SFV, So.Cal.
#13
Just a side note,
I am not sure about cars, but I run better on Ethanol.
 


Similar threads



Top