Post your datazap datalogs !!

dyn085

2000 Post Club
Member ID
#1041
Messages
2,434
Likes
820
#21
Out of curiosity (and because I'm a data whore) I went and did a couple of pulls to compare a drop-in filter (I have the Cobb) against OEM. Not surprisingly (FI application), there doesn't show to be any discernible difference. I'm currently trying to find someone local-ish that has either the Mountune intake or one that is modded similarly to test as well. The odd numbered logs were headed North while the even numbers were headed South. Everything was done within the span of 10-15 minutes.
http://www.datazap.me/u/dyn085/filter-test?log=0&data=9
http://www.datazap.me/u/dyn085/filter-test-0?log=0&data=9
 


Hijinx

3000 Post Club
Member ID
#923
Messages
3,290
Likes
1,670
#22
I'll start using this "datazap" tomorrow. I have lots of logs.
 


Member ID
#968
Messages
66
Likes
0
#23
With some of the data I've seen on here with an aftermarket intercooler it made me think about how inefficient our stock intercoolers really are. So i went to an Autocross this weekend in Stockton and decided to log some runs and see how it does under those conditions. It was roughly 90 degrees. I started the logs a little before i started my run so you can see the heat soak build up, then just as i take off temps drope dramatically, and then slowly climb back up. Quite a bit from start to finish. These 2 runs were 46 seconds each. Just started playing with datalogging on the Cobb so this is the first real attempt. In other words don't bash me if i didn't get every piece of important data!
http://www.datazap.me/u/jayroddrumz/autocross-run-3-approx-90-degrees?log=0&data=4-8
http://www.datazap.me/u/jayroddrumz/autocross-run-90-degree-ambient-temp-approx?log=0&data=4-8
 


razorlab

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#1155
Messages
1,207
Likes
128
#24
With some of the data I've seen on here with an aftermarket intercooler it made me think about how inefficient our stock intercoolers really are. So i went to an Autocross this weekend in Stockton and decided to log some runs and see how it does under those conditions. It was roughly 90 degrees. I started the logs a little before i started my run so you can see the heat soak build up, then just as i take off temps drope dramatically, and then slowly climb back up. Quite a bit from start to finish. These 2 runs were 46 seconds each. Just started playing with datalogging on the Cobb so this is the first real attempt. In other words don't bash me if i didn't get every piece of important data!
http://www.datazap.me/u/jayroddrumz/autocross-run-3-approx-90-degrees?log=0&data=4-8
http://www.datazap.me/u/jayroddrumz/autocross-run-90-degree-ambient-temp-approx?log=0&data=4-8
Wow 128 Charge Temps..

Even your coolant temps are toasty at 220!!!
 


Member ID
#968
Messages
66
Likes
0
#25
Yeah it got pretty hot. Seems to cool back down pretty quick when not on it hard. But seems like your new IC is much more efficient. This was on stage 0 tune as well.
 


OP
Sourskittle

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Member ID
#864
Messages
4,567
Likes
862
Thread Starter #26
With some of the data I've seen on here with an aftermarket intercooler it made me think about how inefficient our stock intercoolers really are. So i went to an Autocross this weekend in Stockton and decided to log some runs and see how it does under those conditions. It was roughly 90 degrees. I started the logs a little before i started my run so you can see the heat soak build up, then just as i take off temps drope dramatically, and then slowly climb back up. Quite a bit from start to finish. These 2 runs were 46 seconds each. Just started playing with datalogging on the Cobb so this is the first real attempt. In other words don't bash me if i didn't get every piece of important data!
http://www.datazap.me/u/jayroddrumz/autocross-run-3-approx-90-degrees?log=0&data=4-8
http://www.datazap.me/u/jayroddrumz/autocross-run-90-degree-ambient-temp-approx?log=0&data=4-8
What aftermarket intercooler?
 


razorlab

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#1155
Messages
1,207
Likes
128
#27
Yeah it got pretty hot. Seems to cool back down pretty quick when not on it hard. But seems like your new IC is much more efficient. This was on stage 0 tune as well.
Yea you don't get much frontal airflow during autox, that is one part of the problem.
 


OP
Sourskittle

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Member ID
#864
Messages
4,567
Likes
862
Thread Starter #30
I just posted new "spool-up" base lines to my datazap. Have not edited them to what each on is, but they are up :)
 


dyn085

2000 Post Club
Member ID
#1041
Messages
2,434
Likes
820
#31
Looked up the cost of a new airbox and determined it was acceptable for if I didn't like the Mountune mod aka unlimited plenum aka Newmission mod aka cutaholeinyouroemboxformoarair mod. The last time I tried this due to another members recommendation on a previous vehicle it killed my mpg and cost over $200 to replace.

Anyhow, I haven't seen any data to support doing this so I figured I would collect some to see if it's actually worthwhile or just throwing away ~$150.

I should have them downloaded soon.
 


OP
Sourskittle

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Member ID
#864
Messages
4,567
Likes
862
Thread Starter #33
That's a full 5 degrees more timing than my OTS running E40. Bet its pulling pretty good up top still !!
 


razorlab

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#1155
Messages
1,207
Likes
128
#34
That's a full 5 degrees more timing than my OTS running E40. Bet its pulling pretty good up top still !!
Which OTS are you running?

It's still meh up top. Dinky turbo is dinky.
 


OP
Sourskittle

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Member ID
#864
Messages
4,567
Likes
862
Thread Starter #35
I am just running Cobb stg3 93oct ots. :)
That's likely what its going on the dyno with too after the turbo swap, assuming it runs safe enough to do so :)
 


razorlab

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#1155
Messages
1,207
Likes
128
#36
You're not going to tune for the turbo?

You should be running more than 12* out the top of a OTS STG3 93oct rom on E40. Are you getting the full 6* advance?

Oh wait, aren't you also running that MAP clamp thingie too?
 


iso100

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#827
Messages
1,500
Likes
135
#37
I don't understand why you would run the Turbo Transformer along with a tune. Why not just add the 2.5psi via the tune and remove the Arduino device?
 


OP
Sourskittle

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Member ID
#864
Messages
4,567
Likes
862
Thread Starter #38
Its getting full 6* advance.

I am going to tune for the turbo, but a tune is not including in the $750 turbo. I'm trying to show what the car will do with just TBE and accessport ots tunes and the turbo. Basiclly, the min mods to have before upgrading the turbo ( honestly, I don't think a catback matters much either ).

After I get a "worst case" dyno in the books, then I will having it tuned for the setup it has ( TBE, UPGRADED TURBO ). Then numbers again to show gains from tuning it.

After that... Its free range. I'll have "worst case", min mods + custom tune, and Rick's car to show full potential.

And yes... I'm ignoring the part on purpose about the turbo-transformer, I refuse to fight with anyone about it, that argument is very over.
 


razorlab

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#1155
Messages
1,207
Likes
128
#39
So I take it you will not use the MAP Clamp thingie for round 1 of the turbo testing?
 


OP
Sourskittle

Sourskittle

4000 Post Club
Member ID
#864
Messages
4,567
Likes
862
Thread Starter #40
I don't understand why you would run the Turbo Transformer along with a tune. Why not just add the 2.5psi via the tune and remove the Arduino device?
I can and will when a custom tune is made. I'm using OtS tunes that are not adjustable without paying more money to cobb or a race tuner. Honestly, on the cobb stg3 OtS tune, it doesn't add almost any boost at all, but it adds response.
 


Similar threads

Ford Community Posts



Top