Post your power ratings!

xxiaze

Active member
Member ID
#12605
Messages
624
Likes
627
#1
Lets see your setups and power ratings tq/hp and what setup. Trying to gauge the community of fiestas out there. What’s the mean average of FiSTs out there. What are you guys running?
 


Business6

Senior Member
Member ID
#7262
Messages
899
Likes
881
#2
Stock Dyno was:
160whp/188tq
mustang Dyno
91 octane
4500' elevation.

As an aside, the "corrected" numbers were 160/222. There's just no air up here. Would have loved to see what it would have done at sea level with 93.
 


gtx3076

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#11673
Messages
1,213
Likes
1,397
#3
205whp/280wtq on E30, fully stock otherwise. Calculated with vdyno.
 


OP
xxiaze

xxiaze

Active member
Member ID
#12605
Messages
624
Likes
627
Thread Starter #4
Stock Dyno was:
160whp/188tq
mustang Dyno
91 octane
4500' elevation.

As an aside, the "corrected" numbers were 160/222. There's just no air up here. Would have loved to see what it would have done at sea level with 93.
where are you being that high and no 93?
 


OP
xxiaze

xxiaze

Active member
Member ID
#12605
Messages
624
Likes
627
Thread Starter #5
205whp/280wtq on E30, fully stock otherwise. Calculated with vdyno.
Those are solid numbers on stocker, who tuned you?
 


Business6

Senior Member
Member ID
#7262
Messages
899
Likes
881
#6
where are you being that high and no 93?
Salt Lake area. The only place I know of that has higher than 91 is out at the Miller track though it goes by Utah Motorsports Campus or whatever now.

We also have zero e85 stations in the state, which is the real killer. Super shitty
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Member ID
#4150
Messages
14,584
Likes
7,104
#7
^^^In a lot of the areas of this land, buying a 'Flex Fuel' labeled vehicle was a REAL waste, considering the dearth of E85 stations in all but a few select areas. [:(] [mad]
 


gtx3076

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#11673
Messages
1,213
Likes
1,397
#8
Those are solid numbers on stocker, who tuned you?
Dizzy custom tuned on E30.

My custom 93 numbers on vdyno were about 173whp/229wtq.

Again, these are on vdyno with the dynojet correction factor which this forum prefers, I used a smoothing of 6 which is a lower average. I'm wary of dynojet because they tend to read significantly higher.

I think compared to others, my car seems to make less power, but when comparing vdynos, who knows? The numbers put out are only as good as the data put in.
 


slopoke

Active member
Member ID
#8584
Messages
649
Likes
640
#9
Hybrid turbo with full bolt ons.

91 octane fuel
dynorunShare_0.png
Hybrid E30 fuel

E30dyno.jpg

Hybrid E40 with 4 Port aux fuel

E40 Aux Fuel.png

Garrett GTX2860R Gen II, Bravo Alpha Intercooler, Full bolt ons.

E40 with 4 port aux fuel

Garrett.png
 


Se7eN

Senior Member
Member ID
#2001
Messages
904
Likes
786
#10
Well back when it had 1,008 miles on it hit the dyno and got 183whp/220wtq bone stock.

Later on Stock turbo but full bolt-ons managed 218whp and 289wtq.

Even Later had 2554R (MRX):
Dynojet 93oct 280whp 298wtq
Dynojet E40 335whp 320wtq

Now a days running an 2860 turbo with port fueling and bolt-ons:
Dynojet 93oct 318whp 327wtq
Dynojet E50 357whp 327wtq
 


Member ID
#10147
Messages
52
Likes
34
#13
That looks a lot like my vdyno all stock with a tune.
I’m not all that stock, so I’m kinda bummed out at that HP number. But I know, not to expect much from just bolt ons. Just makes me want to upgrade the turbo even sooner 😏
 




Top