We all know why Ford is quitting the car business. We all know what "they" say about why everybody wants CUVs and SUVs instead of cars. But I wonder if this is another example of the divide being created in our great country. With the end of the stay at home order last week, we made the trip to visit my elderly parents, something we'd not done since mid-March when we dropped by to say hi on our way to the ST Octane Academy. They live in a tiny town in the rural southern Ozarks. In a county which has yet to have recorded a single case of COVID-19. It's a three hour drive on rural state highway, hilly and winding, that finishes with 60 miles of dual lane US highway. We try to get down there once a month to check on them and help them with maintenance on the house. Usually we're driving at night since we leave after work and dinner to go down, and the same coming back. But this time we drove down on Saturday morning. And we took the Fiesta ST instead of the F150. Much faster on the curves and hills, without even feeling like you're hurrying. Trip took 20 minutes less than usual. But I digress.
What I noticed was that there were predominantly two types of vehicles we encountered on the road, excluding farm tractors and the like. Mostly pickup trucks, as you'd expect. Probably 60%, maybe more. But next most common were cars. Yes, a fair number of still-available performance coupes like Corvettes, Camaros, Challengers, Mustangs. But lots of sedans. Old Chevies. Buicks. A few Fords. Fair number of Hondas and Toyotas. Small cars like Chevy Aveos, a couple of vanilla Fiestas and one or two older Focuses. But almost no CUVs, and the only SUVs tended to be what I consider "real" SUVs--Tahoes, Suburbans, old Explorers.
It made me wonder why it is that people in a relatively poor rural area choose these vehicles. Are they just out of fashion? Or is it that they don't really care about what fashion influencers say and they buy what works, what they want, or what is cheap and reliable? Or is it that they don't need a vehicle to project a rugged, self-reliant, outdoorsy image for them because they are all those things.
At any rate it gave me something to muse upon while cruise controlling my way down the dual lane. It was dark when we came home, no traffic. I think I made the trip even 5 or 10 minutes faster.
What I noticed was that there were predominantly two types of vehicles we encountered on the road, excluding farm tractors and the like. Mostly pickup trucks, as you'd expect. Probably 60%, maybe more. But next most common were cars. Yes, a fair number of still-available performance coupes like Corvettes, Camaros, Challengers, Mustangs. But lots of sedans. Old Chevies. Buicks. A few Fords. Fair number of Hondas and Toyotas. Small cars like Chevy Aveos, a couple of vanilla Fiestas and one or two older Focuses. But almost no CUVs, and the only SUVs tended to be what I consider "real" SUVs--Tahoes, Suburbans, old Explorers.
It made me wonder why it is that people in a relatively poor rural area choose these vehicles. Are they just out of fashion? Or is it that they don't really care about what fashion influencers say and they buy what works, what they want, or what is cheap and reliable? Or is it that they don't need a vehicle to project a rugged, self-reliant, outdoorsy image for them because they are all those things.
At any rate it gave me something to muse upon while cruise controlling my way down the dual lane. It was dark when we came home, no traffic. I think I made the trip even 5 or 10 minutes faster.