What sort of voltage/mA readings/ranges are Forscan users getting for their 02 sensor?
Specifically:
1. 02S11, V (Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor (bank 1, sensor 1)
2. 02S11_CUR, mA (Exhauist Gas Oxygen Sensor Current Bank 1 Sensor 1)
3. 02S22_IMPED, V (O2S11 sensor impedance is expresses as a voltage)
4. 02S12, V (Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor (bank 1, sensor 2)
I've seen results from other users (presumably COBB Accessport users) showing results in the range of 0.1 to 0.9V; but I'm unsure if this is the same reading generated by Forscan for the 02S11 sensor output, given the PID coding isn't available to compare. It's possible the PCM/ECU amplifies the signal to improve control sensitivity, but I'm not sure if the Forscan PID coding has to factor this in.
I know the AFR reading EQ_RAT11, :1 dictates a lot of the mapping, but that result is only as good as the Upper 02 sensor is reading. The Lower 02 sensor is purely there to confirm the CAT is working.
Specifically:
1. 02S11, V (Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor (bank 1, sensor 1)
2. 02S11_CUR, mA (Exhauist Gas Oxygen Sensor Current Bank 1 Sensor 1)
3. 02S22_IMPED, V (O2S11 sensor impedance is expresses as a voltage)
4. 02S12, V (Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor (bank 1, sensor 2)
I've seen results from other users (presumably COBB Accessport users) showing results in the range of 0.1 to 0.9V; but I'm unsure if this is the same reading generated by Forscan for the 02S11 sensor output, given the PID coding isn't available to compare. It's possible the PCM/ECU amplifies the signal to improve control sensitivity, but I'm not sure if the Forscan PID coding has to factor this in.
I know the AFR reading EQ_RAT11, :1 dictates a lot of the mapping, but that result is only as good as the Upper 02 sensor is reading. The Lower 02 sensor is purely there to confirm the CAT is working.
