Thoughts on STance?

rooSTer

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#341
Messages
1,785
Likes
129
#1
What are your thoughts on such aggressive STance?




 


Member ID
#496
Messages
193
Likes
2
#2
Not a fan of those wheels but the stance is cool.
 


rodmoe

5000 Post Club
Member ID
#342
Messages
5,810
Likes
585
#3
Great effort and I kinda like the look but not for me :)
 


Colin1337

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#586
Messages
1,488
Likes
61
#4
Function over form. I do loath wheel gap though lol
 


Member ID
#527
Messages
1
Likes
15
#5
It might as well be a statue because it would never be driven where I live....one pothole fughettabowtit
 


TheStig

Senior Member
Member ID
#540
Messages
860
Likes
118
#6
this I do not have a problem with, its this camber thing that has come with a lot of cars that have "stance". All these HardParking kids who would rather go into an alley for a photoshoot and hold up traffic at every bump and curb than go to the track. This Fiesta looks decent, its when they go stupid camber and stretched tires that it looks back, example below...

 


STooge

Active member
Member ID
#474
Messages
534
Likes
34
#7
Terrible. There is no function at that point. It will handle like crap and ride even worse. Not to mention in my very honest opinion it looks like garbage.
 


pelotonracer2

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#517
Messages
1,437
Likes
315
#8
Not my thing... I think it looks retarded. To each his own I guess. lol[8]
 


stuntdoogie

2000 Post Club
Member ID
#426
Messages
2,202
Likes
174
#9
Whoever started this trend needs to be shot! It looks rediculous with the massive negative camber. I like low cars and hate wheel gap but damn that going overboard. Just my opinion.
 


C. love

Active member
Member ID
#507
Messages
546
Likes
84
#10
Whoever started this trend needs to be shot! It looks rediculous with the massive negative camber. I like low cars and hate wheel gap but damn that going overboard. Just my opinion.
it originated in japan and is known as oni-kian (spelling) aka demon camber. They do it just cause they can. Some cases are rediculous some I like. Depends on the car and how extreme they go.

As for above i like the wheels hate the color. the fitment on the front doesnt match the rear which i would
fix. I also will place a guess this car is bagged NOT static so he/she can probably raise the car.

Eventually my car will eitger have air and very aggressive (camber, stretch tire) wheel fitment. or coilovers and aggressive (wide wheel wide tire) fitment just not sure yet.
 


Member ID
#439
Messages
507
Likes
76
#11
I like it on other people's vehicle, not mine. A nice drop and maybe a 17X8 and I will be good.
 


TheStig

Senior Member
Member ID
#540
Messages
860
Likes
118
#12
Can japan just make a trend of street legal road race cars, that way it trickles down over here and we see Sumo Power R35 GTR's and wide body S2000's everywhere.

That's the world I want to live in...
 


C. love

Active member
Member ID
#507
Messages
546
Likes
84
#13
^ they have that too. its just expensive so people go with the cheaper things. Be glad huge bosu pipes and rev kimiter competitions havent caught on lol. I will say im a fan of most anything. Although my love is drift cars followed by GT/Roadrace cars i love the looks and performance .
 


Member ID
#592
Messages
18
Likes
0
#14
Pass! It looks like its trying too hard to be.... something. Looks silly actually.
 


C. love

Active member
Member ID
#507
Messages
546
Likes
84
#16
i did a search for onikyan AKA demon camber--which came before the stance type stuff and its waaay more extreme





it gets much worse than stance stuff lol.

i personally like this car (i think this is the one originally posted??)



and this

its super low on coilovers and on good wheels. Maybe not functional for race purposes but i think it looks good , minus the odd stuff on the side



more of above car

http://tupanx.wordpress.com/2014/01/17/jdm-ford-fiesta-modification/



If these cars were AWD ?i would be all over the rally look as it looks so right on these cars. example

 


Colin1337

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#586
Messages
1,488
Likes
61
#17
There's a difference between low and stanced in my opinion. Low might tuck a bit of tire. Stanced tucks a good bit of tire annnnd has crazy camber.

The latter I'm not a fan of.
 


Harvick

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#339
Messages
1,144
Likes
107
#18
There's a difference between low and stanced in my opinion. Low might tuck a bit of tire. Stanced tucks a good bit of tire annnnd has crazy camber.

The latter I'm not a fan of.
I completely agree. Most stanced vehicles that I've seen involves camber adjustments in order to get the wheels to tucked underneath the fender.
 


Perry

Active member
Member ID
#535
Messages
611
Likes
53
#19
There's a difference between low and stanced in my opinion. Low might tuck a bit of tire. Stanced tucks a good bit of tire annnnd has crazy camber.

The latter I'm not a fan of.
+1 and then some.
 




Top