[MENTION=879]D1JL[/MENTION]
I bet you a buffalo nickel a smart person would use that fact if they ever rear ended someone who had tinted tail lights. It's just too damn easy.
Tinted tail lights = against the law.
Accident caused (regardless of truth) by the inability to see lights.
Now it is on the owner of the illegal light modification to try to prove his innocence. Regardless of facts (I use brighter lights to make up for the tinting and you can see it better!), it's still illegal.
All the lawyer/judge has to do is ask "are your lights illegally tinted?" technically, yes but... "no buts sonny, I have enough facts.... off with his head! Case closed".
It's like making modifications that mess with passing SMOG in California. Even if it makes the car POSSIBLY better as an environmental concern, if it's not smog legal... the mod is ILLEGAL and its a fail.
That's my opinion at least
