Falken Azenis RT660 Coming Soon - RE71R contender?

rallytaff

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#1899
Messages
1,415
Likes
954
#81
Be that as it may, that does NOT explain why a patch the size of a contact patch of a tyre on the road was worn on two of them. My alignment is done by a guy in Glendale and is anal when it comes to getting it right. His computerized machine is spot on, even with my ST. I only had this problem with Falkens.
 


HBEcoBeaST

Active member
Member ID
#7171
Messages
790
Likes
418
#82
Be that as it may, that does NOT explain why a patch the size of a contact patch of a tyre on the road was worn on two of them. My alignment is done by a guy in Glendale and is anal when it comes to getting it right. His computerized machine is spot on, even with my ST. I only had this problem with Falkens.
How often were they rotated? I could go through front falkens 615+ s pretty easily in 10k. Especially if they weren't rotated for 10k. Most people running 615+s get around 15k even when rotated every 3k miles in a FiST, much less if you drive aggressively or track.

That's why many of us (me included) get 'worse' tires like Indy 500s and bfg sc2s. You don't have to rotate as often and they last much longer than 200utg. Also more forgiving if you aren't anal about rotations and proper psi. IMO the 200utg and below tires are for track focused individuals, if it's your daily they don't make sense. Lots of upkeep and the benefits only come when you push the car. Plus they don't last as long and generally cost more.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 


rallytaff

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#1899
Messages
1,415
Likes
954
#83
Forget the rotation, it still doesn't explain why a contact patch on two tyres was there and flat spotted when I didn't do an emergency stops. Just doesn't make sense. This was in a stock 2003 Focus hatchback. Why weren't Falken interested in seeing the tyres? Didn't want to admit to a faulty product? It makes you wonder.
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Member ID
#4150
Messages
14,674
Likes
7,167
#84
IMO the 200utg and below tires are for track focused individuals, if it's your daily they don't make sense. Lots of upkeep and the benefits only come when you push the car. Plus they don't last as long and generally cost more.
I generally agree with this above, but, most of these tire manufacturers ONLY offer sizes we can use in their 100/200 (or even lower tread wear rated, R compound PURE track tires and slicks!), and NOT in their more 'pedestrian' 300 and up tread wear street tires. [mad]
 


Member ID
#8934
Messages
404
Likes
574
#85
Be that as it may, that does NOT explain why a patch the size of a contact patch of a tyre on the road was worn on two of them. My alignment is done by a guy in Glendale and is anal when it comes to getting it right. His computerized machine is spot on, even with my ST. I only had this problem with Falkens.
I would have certainly made a warranty claim if the tires were that bad, that fast. Did both the bald spots happen to be on the back wheels?
 


HBEcoBeaST

Active member
Member ID
#7171
Messages
790
Likes
418
#86
Forget the rotation, it still doesn't explain why a contact patch on two tyres was there and flat spotted when I didn't do an emergency stops. Just doesn't make sense. This was in a stock 2003 Focus hatchback. Why weren't Falken interested in seeing the tyres? Didn't want to admit to a faulty product? It makes you wonder.
I can't speak for your exact situation, but wear is never covered for sports tires. The fact that they weren't rotated gives even more grounds they were improperly installed and/or maintained.

Ever consider the tires wore out? 10k on just the fronts would easily do a set of 200utg tires in. If people get less than 20k (more like 15k) out of 615+s even rotated regularly, that's less than 10k of the tire's life on the front. Between being fwd and your front tires doing the most work during braking, they wear twice as fast as the rears. Hence the frequent rotation. Once you get a little uneven wear, tires really go quick.

IME defective tire symptoms include bulging, cracking or tread separation. What you're describing is wear and 10,000 miles on the front of a fwd car is a lot for aggressive compounds.

Not an expert just my experience and 2¢

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 


Member ID
#11311
Messages
420
Likes
326
#87
Not sure how it's even obscurely possible for a tire itself to cause flatspotting. What is the manufacturer to think? Two out of four tires only? Front or back?
 


Plainrt

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#2159
Messages
1,386
Likes
688
#88
You sure someone didn’t borrow your car and do some high speed brake test lol. Also I believe any brand can have defects and if I get a bad product one time it won’t stop me from buying again in future. I use to hate ford up until the fiesta st came here. Now I’m on my 2nd fist.
 


TyphoonFiST

9000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#3304
Messages
11,865
Likes
8,316
#89
You sure someone didn’t borrow your car and do some high speed brake test lol. Also I believe any brand can have defects and if I get a bad product one time it won’t stop me from buying again in future. I use to hate ford up until the fiesta st came here. Now I’m on my 2nd fist.
This all depends on the customer service and the handling of the issue at hand.IMO.

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk
 


Member ID
#8934
Messages
404
Likes
574
#90
My thought was some handbrake-related issues - either unintentional because some people are silly, or intentionally by service department hoons.
 


HBEcoBeaST

Active member
Member ID
#7171
Messages
790
Likes
418
#91
My thought was some handbrake-related issues - either unintentional because some people are silly, or intentionally by service department hoons.
Yea I didn't want to say hand brake turn [emoji51] my worst fear is someone hooning my car like it was a rental.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 


Plainrt

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#2159
Messages
1,386
Likes
688
#92
225/45-15 rt660 on 15x8 vs 205/50-16 re71r on 16x7

973188A9-90F3-499B-B49A-698DD16E7D29.jpeg
 


Last edited:

wetwea33

Active member
Member ID
#8616
Messages
634
Likes
494
#95
Everyone who's put some miles on these, how do the sidewalls feel. Really miss the stuff sidewall and amazing turn in of the re50s. Running R888r now and they just don't have nearly the same sensation.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Member ID
#4150
Messages
14,674
Likes
7,167
#96
Everyone who's put some miles on these, how do the sidewalls feel. Really miss the stuff sidewall and amazing turn in of the re50s. Running R888r now and they just don't have nearly the same sensation.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I'd be willing to bet that the 205/40-17 R888Rs have a better turn-in response than the factory 050s do.

Apples to apples, as far as size comparison goes. [wink]
 


wetwea33

Active member
Member ID
#8616
Messages
634
Likes
494
#98
I'd be willing to bet that the 205/40-17 R888Rs have a better turn-in response than the factory 050s do.

Apples to apples, as far as size comparison goes. [wink]
Nah both the bridgestones are known for stiff sidewalls and quick turn in (re050 and re71s) but I also went down to a 16 with more sidewall. Still didn't expect them to be as soft as they are. Haven't liked these tires at all honestly.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 


M-Sport fan

9000 Post Club
Member ID
#4150
Messages
14,674
Likes
7,167
#99
Nah both the bridgestones are known for stiff sidewalls and quick turn in (re050 and re71s) but I also went down to a 16 with more sidewall. Still didn't expect them to be as soft as they are. Haven't liked these tires at all honestly.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
This is very surprising, considering that they are a 100 tread wear gumball, which is considered a pure open track, time attack, etc. type tire which is only supposed to be bested in grip/turn-in by the 50 tread wear (and under, down to 00) road race slicks out there. [???:)]
 


HBEcoBeaST

Active member
Member ID
#7171
Messages
790
Likes
418
This is very surprising, considering that they are a 100 tread wear gumball, which is considered a pure open track, time attack, etc. type tire which is only supposed to be bested in grip/turn-in by the 50 tread wear and under road race slicks out there. [???:)]
Actual traction is up, softer sidewall effects steering feel more than traction with these tires. I feel the same way with RSRs, RSRRs and the bfg Rivals. Excellent traction, but they can feel squishy and feedback/turn in isn't the best. Going down to a smaller wheel will also affect turn in. I really noticed it going from 17" crappy AS tires to 16" on slightly stretched Indy's, still lost a little turn in and feel.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 


Similar threads



Top