Navigation option worth it for Sync 3?

Member ID
#7196
Messages
47
Likes
11
#1
What is the general consensus on the nav option? I have an Android and it looks like 2016+ have Android Auto available.

Is there any reason to opt for the $700 nav option or is Google Maps far better?
 


Member ID
#5428
Messages
365
Likes
90
#2
I have Nav and never use it because gmaps is so much better and offers traffic. If I'd realized this, I probably wouldn't have got Nav. When I bought, we didn't have android auto working yet.

Sent from my SM-G870W using Tapatalk
 


kivnul

1000 Post Club
Member ID
#3947
Messages
1,207
Likes
732
#3
If I have to look someplace up on my phone to figure its address, I'd rather just use the phone to navigate instead of typing it up into the car. Now that both apple/android phones hook right up, there is no reason to get the nav option. I rarely use mine. (only reason I got it was a sale and limited selection of cars)
 


Bluedrank

Active member
Member ID
#3739
Messages
676
Likes
254
#4
Not in the slightest. Google Maps and Android Auto are so much better than the stock system. Definitely not worth paying extra money for Nav at this point.
 


OP
S
Member ID
#7196
Messages
47
Likes
11
Thread Starter #5
Thanks everyone for the responses. This makes it much easier, now all I have to look for is a FiST with Recaro's.
 


Member ID
#3073
Messages
221
Likes
20
#6
What do you mean hook right up? Can gmaps be shown on the fiestas LCD screen straight from the phone?

Or do I still have to look at my phone when using gmaps?
 


Member ID
#4782
Messages
151
Likes
35
#7
I love my Nav.

Despite what people say, having google maps simply isn't the best option sometimes.
There are moments where I have no cell signal but my Nav still works perfect. Saved me lots. At this price point, it's a no brainer.. now would I pay $2.2k+ to have it in a Subaru...? Dunno...
 


Member ID
#6835
Messages
206
Likes
39
#8
I love my Nav.

Despite what people say, having google maps simply isn't the best option sometimes.
There are moments where I have no cell signal but my Nav still works perfect. Saved me lots. At this price point, it's a no brainer.. now would I pay $2.2k+ to have it in a Subaru...? Dunno...
I also love having the navigation option. I too have issues getting signal at times with my cell service. Never have issues with Sync 3 navigation.
 


Member ID
#5177
Messages
115
Likes
16
#9
Personally, now that CarPlay is out, I wouldn't get the nav option. If you're worried about losing signal on your phone when using maps, you could always download the map for "offline" viewing on your phone. Good thing is with apple/google maps, you'll always have the latest maps with traffic conditions without having to pay extra for Sirius XM services
 


brbauer2

Active member
Member ID
#5878
Messages
766
Likes
533
#10
Just get a standalone GPS for much cheaper and keep it in the glovebox for backup if you are worried about losing signal.
 


Member ID
#6835
Messages
206
Likes
39
#11
STArk,

You will get varying opinions on this based on numerous considerations.

1. Cost
2. Options wanted desired
3. Location
4. Financial Position


If you are buying the car with numerous option upgrades, it will be much tougher to find one without NAV. Most who bought or optioned Recaro Seats received the NAV (there are exceptions of course). This also holds true for the Sun Roof (again, there are exceptions). GOOGLE Maps will be tough to beat, but the Sync 3 NAV works well, especially if you have and intend to keep Serious XM, as I have. $700 for this option is a lot, but for me is well worth what I spent for it. Also, should be mentioned that Sync 3 NAV runs heads and shoulders above SYNC 2. So if your experience and others replying do not have experience with the 2 different versions, please keep this in mind.

Note:
Go on youtube and watch videos on how the system works to get a better understanding.

Best of Luck,
 


Member ID
#6026
Messages
71
Likes
66
#12
The people complaining about no cell service with Google Maps and Android Auto need to learn about Offline maps. I have my whole state saved for Offline mode.
 


Member ID
#4782
Messages
151
Likes
35
#13
The people complaining about no cell service with Google Maps and Android Auto need to learn about Offline maps. I have my whole state saved for Offline mode.
I don't download offline maps for fun, especially before I go somewhere. Just saying. Allows me to be spontaneous and not worry about an additional factor. Also, I never have to worry about my phone battery being low, being placed in a weird position that cant be reached by charging cable. If you don't like the Nav, don't get it, and I don't 'need' to like offline maps!
 


Member ID
#6547
Messages
23
Likes
6
#14
I have a 16 with Sync 3 and nav and am pretty happy with it. I live in a semi-rural area so phone service is spotty, let alone 4G internet. The nav hasn't ever lost signal even when I'm way out in the boonies. I also like not having to plug my phone in or mess with anything to get to the navigation, it's just right there in the dash. It is all personal preference but it works well for me.
 


Member ID
#6298
Messages
40
Likes
8
#15
My '16 has the nav and I liked it but now that the new Android Auto update came out it defaults to my phones GPS and I can't even use the cars nav with my phone hooked up. Really stupid to be honest.
 


Similar threads



Top