PumaSpeed Variable Volume Intake Manifold

ron@whoosh

3000 Post Club
Vendor
Premium Account
Member ID
#5638
Messages
3,998
Likes
4,101
#42

Jabbit

2000 Post Club
Member ID
#11420
Messages
2,244
Likes
2,904
#43
thanks,
that's the current XDI 35 HPFP and 30% injectors
there is an XDI EVO HPFP and 50% injectors not listed on the site yet and really woud not be needed unless north of 400whp
Worth it on an S280 tuned for 93? I'll be your test dummy if you want. I've got Dyno time upcoming....
 


ron@whoosh

3000 Post Club
Vendor
Premium Account
Member ID
#5638
Messages
3,998
Likes
4,101
#46
Worth it on an S280 tuned for 93? I'll be your test dummy if you want. I've got Dyno time upcoming....
for 93 octane the I'd only add 30% injectors
no need for the XDI pump
 


jeffreylyon

1000 Post Club
Premium Account
Member ID
#4448
Messages
1,323
Likes
1,117
#48
An injector bung could be welded above each port, that would not be hard. Drill a hole, weld the bung, no AUX spacer needed. The problem I see with the AUX injectors is that they are batch fired. I'm not a tuner or a computer nerd but how hard would it be to tap into the stock injector harness and pair up the injectors. I'm sure that resistance or ohms or some other electrical engineering black magic would come into play but hey something to think about.
The stock injectors fire after the intake value closes (direct injection engine), so we can't "piggy-back" on the injector signal to fire injectors that are on the other side of the intake value without pooling fuel in front of the value which is the complaint with the Split Second controller.
 


Member ID
#19442
Messages
606
Likes
910
#49
The stock injectors fire after the intake value closes (direct injection engine), so we can't "piggy-back" on the injector signal to fire injectors that are on the other side of the intake value without pooling fuel in front of the value which is the complaint with the Split Second controller.
OK.
 




Top