ok great, thanks for the info. Hopefully upgrading the intake will help with some gains in HP/TQ.
Well I can tel you I would not always take one shops dyno numbers as accurate. There is a lot that comes into play with dynoās and indeed shops can make the numbers look better or worse by calibration of the dyno.
When I did my S280 initially it was dyno tuned by a local shop that did a lot of Subies and some Fords more Focus than FiST. They were the same place Matt Farahās FiST with just a tune turned out 231 hp and 256 ft lbs torque or right around that.
My initial tune and dyno run with them came out to 215hp and 256 ft lbs of TQ . š This was right after they had by their own words correctly recalibrated their dyno which was a Mustang Dyno. Known for lower numbers than a Dynojet dyno. I was pretty shocked as the car definitely felt stronger than that. They dismissed the whole dyno chart thing away and said if I had had the car on a Dynojet it would about read about 50-60 HP more . Which actually put my Turbo right about where it should be for a 91 octane tune.
You are also at 1500 ft above sea level and someone like me is at sea level numbers will show lower at higher elevations IIRC